Czech Sociological Review

781 papers and 4.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 781 papers published in Czech Sociological Review in the last decades have received a total of 4.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Czech Sociological Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (384 papers), Political Science and International Relations (223 papers) and Demography (100 papers) specifically the topics of Social Policy and Reform Studies (83 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (65 papers) and Urbanization and City Planning (54 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Czech Sociological Review are Milada Rabušicová, Piotr Sztompka, Petr Matějů, Tomáš Kostelecký, Jessie Bernard, Jiří Musil, Dana Hamplová, D. Bruce Johnstone, Sandra T. Marquart‐Pyatt and Pieter Vanhuysse.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Czech Sociological Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Czech Sociological Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Czech Sociological Review.

Countries where authors publish in Czech Sociological Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Czech Sociological Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Czech Sociological Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Czech Sociological Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025