This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cybersecurity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cybersecurity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cybersecurity more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Cybersecurity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cybersecurity.
About Cybersecurity
The 404 papers published in Cybersecurity in the last decades have received a total of 5.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Cybersecurity usually cover Signal Processing (105 papers), Artificial Intelligence (228 papers), Computer Networks and Communications (130 papers), Software (21 papers) and Information Systems (115 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Malware Detection Techniques (98 papers), Network Security and Intrusion Detection (96 papers), Cryptography and Data Security (63 papers), Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting (50 papers), Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption (48 papers), Cryptographic Implementations and Security (45 papers), Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data (33 papers) and Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications (31 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cybersecurity are Ansam Khraisat, Joarder Kamruzzaman, Peter W. Vamplew, Iqbal Gondal, Ammar Alazab, Sajjad Waheed, Jun Li, Chao Zhang, Wei Wang and Sushil Kumar.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.