Current Pain and Headache Reports

1.8k papers and 38.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.8k papers published in Current Pain and Headache Reports in the last decades have received a total of 38.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Current Pain and Headache Reports usually cover Psychiatry and Mental health (864 papers), Physiology (601 papers) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (569 papers) specifically the topics of Migraine and Headache Studies (725 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (308 papers) and Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (295 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Pain and Headache Reports are Luiz Paulo Queiroz, Alan D. Kaye, Richard B. Lipton, Robert D. Gerwin, Peter J. Goadsby, Alex Zautra, Christian Wöber, Marcelo E. Bigal, Dan Levy and John A. Sturgeon.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Current Pain and Headache Reports

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Pain and Headache Reports. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Pain and Headache Reports.

Countries where authors publish in Current Pain and Headache Reports

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Pain and Headache Reports. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Pain and Headache Reports with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Pain and Headache Reports more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025