Cuadernos de Literatura

242 papers and 167 indexed citations i.

About

The 242 papers published in Cuadernos de Literatura in the last decades have received a total of 167 indexed citations. Papers published in Cuadernos de Literatura usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (111 papers), Cultural Studies (101 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (74 papers) specifically the topics of Latin American Literature Studies (73 papers), Comparative Literary Analysis and Criticism (56 papers) and Cultural and Social Studies in Latin America (44 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cuadernos de Literatura are Mabel Moraña, Mary Louise Pratt, Cristián Opazo, Suzanne Jill Levine, Arturo Arias, Mariano Siskind, Luis Fernando Restrepo, Ileana Rodríguez, Jesús Martín Barbero and Jeffrey Cedeño.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cuadernos de Literatura

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cuadernos de Literatura. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cuadernos de Literatura.

Countries where authors publish in Cuadernos de Literatura

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cuadernos de Literatura. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cuadernos de Literatura with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cuadernos de Literatura more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025