Conflict Resolution Quarterly

553 papers and 4.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 553 papers published in Conflict Resolution Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 4.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Conflict Resolution Quarterly usually cover Sociology and Political Science (365 papers), Social Psychology (99 papers) and Clinical Psychology (94 papers) specifically the topics of Conflict Management and Negotiation (151 papers), Peacebuilding and International Security (42 papers) and Dispute Resolution and Class Actions (39 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Conflict Resolution Quarterly are Tricia S. Jones, Joan B. Kelly, Mark S. Umbreit, Mary E. Rogge, Adrienne B. Dessel, Lisa Blomgren Bingham, Tyler R. Harrison, Timothy Hedeen, Susan S. Raines and Roselle Wissler.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Conflict Resolution Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Conflict Resolution Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Conflict Resolution Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in Conflict Resolution Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Conflict Resolution Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Conflict Resolution Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Conflict Resolution Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025