Countries where authors publish in Cosmic Research
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cosmic Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cosmic Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cosmic Research more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Cosmic Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cosmic Research.
About Cosmic Research
The 1.6k papers published in Cosmic Research in the last decades have received a total of 7.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Cosmic Research usually cover Astronomy and Astrophysics (1.0k papers), Aerospace Engineering (551 papers), Geophysics (165 papers), Oceanography (132 papers) and Modeling and Simulation (46 papers) specifically the topics of Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (449 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (448 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (392 papers), Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (348 papers), Planetary Science and Exploration (271 papers), Spacecraft Dynamics and Control (226 papers), Space Satellite Systems and Control (188 papers) and Aerospace Engineering and Control Systems (178 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cosmic Research are Yu. I. Yermolaev, А. А. Тихонов, V. G. Petukhov, Yu. N. Chelnokov, M. Yu. Yermolaev, И. Г. Лодкина, N. S. Nikolaeva, А. А. Суханов, В В Сазонов and С. А. Пулинец.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.