Contemporary Jewry

461 papers and 1.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 461 papers published in Contemporary Jewry in the last decades have received a total of 1.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Contemporary Jewry usually cover Sociology and Political Science (377 papers), Demography (290 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (27 papers) specifically the topics of Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (292 papers), Jewish Identity and Society (271 papers) and Religion and Society Interactions (50 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Contemporary Jewry are Bethamie Horowitz, Barry R. Chiswick, Sergio DellaPergola, Bruce A. Phillips, Leonard Saxe, Steven M. Cohen, Ira M. Sheskin, Charles Kadushin, Carmel U. Chiswick and Steven M. Cohen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Contemporary Jewry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Contemporary Jewry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Contemporary Jewry.

Countries where authors publish in Contemporary Jewry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Contemporary Jewry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Contemporary Jewry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Contemporary Jewry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025