Contemporary Italian Politics

353 papers and 2.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 353 papers published in Contemporary Italian Politics in the last decades have received a total of 2.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Contemporary Italian Politics usually cover Political Science and International Relations (224 papers), Sociology and Political Science (148 papers) and Communication (28 papers) specifically the topics of Populism, Right-Wing Movements (120 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (82 papers) and Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (61 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Contemporary Italian Politics are Fabio Bordignon, Cristina Archetti, Gianfranco Pasquino, Pietro Castelli Gattinara, Daniele Albertazzi, Marco Tarchi, James L. Newell, Roberto D’Alimonte, Ilvo Diamanti and Alessandro Chiaramonte.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Contemporary Italian Politics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Contemporary Italian Politics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Contemporary Italian Politics.

Countries where authors publish in Contemporary Italian Politics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Contemporary Italian Politics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Contemporary Italian Politics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Contemporary Italian Politics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025