Clinics in Plastic Surgery

2.9k papers and 62.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.9k papers published in Clinics in Plastic Surgery in the last decades have received a total of 62.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinics in Plastic Surgery usually cover Surgery (2.0k papers), Dermatology (663 papers) and Genetics (358 papers) specifically the topics of Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (761 papers), Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques (542 papers) and Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques (472 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinics in Plastic Surgery are Sydney R. Coleman, Robert S. Flowers, Roger K. Khouri, Arnold I. Caplan, P Tessier, David G. Greenhalgh, Susan E. Mackinnon, William W. Shaw, José Guerrerosantos and Paule Regnault.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Clinics in Plastic Surgery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinics in Plastic Surgery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinics in Plastic Surgery.

Countries where authors publish in Clinics in Plastic Surgery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinics in Plastic Surgery. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinics in Plastic Surgery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinics in Plastic Surgery more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025