Clinics in Liver Disease

1.4k papers and 42.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.4k papers published in Clinics in Liver Disease in the last decades have received a total of 42.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinics in Liver Disease usually cover Hepatology (1.1k papers), Epidemiology (1.0k papers) and Surgery (457 papers) specifically the topics of Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (922 papers), Liver Disease and Transplantation (509 papers) and Hepatitis C virus research (311 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinics in Liver Disease are Arthur I. Cederbaum, Arthur J. McCullough, Zobair M. Younossi, Hyman J. Zimmerman, Katherine A. McGlynn, Don C. Rockey, Arun J. Sanyal, K. Rajender Reddy, Anne M. Larson and Leonard B. Seeff.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Clinics in Liver Disease

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinics in Liver Disease. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinics in Liver Disease.

Countries where authors publish in Clinics in Liver Disease

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinics in Liver Disease. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinics in Liver Disease with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinics in Liver Disease more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025