Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C Toxicology & Pharmacology
3.3k papers
receiving
101.1k citations
Peers
Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C Toxicology & Pharmacology
Comparison fields: 5 of 211
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis42.2k
Aquatic Science15.5k
Pollution21.1k
Physiology7.7k
Immunology12.6k
Replace Marine Environmental Research with:
Marine Environmental ResearchUnited States
Environmental Toxicology and PharmacologyChina
Archives of Environmental Contamination and ToxicologyUnited States
British Journal Of NutritionUnited Kingdom
EcotoxicologyUnited States
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General SubjectsUnited States
Journal of Animal ScienceUnited States
Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and ToxicologyUnited States
Molecular and Cellular EndocrinologyUnited States
Biochemical PharmacologyUnited States
Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C Toxicology & Pharmacologyrelative toMarine Environmental ResearchUnited StatesMarine Environmental Research's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
Marine Environmental Research · 1×
×0.742k/61kHTM
×1.416k/11kAS
×0.421k/48kPOLLU
×1.78k/5kPHYSI
×2.713k/5kIMMUN
Citations per year
'16
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24
'25
'26
Countries where authors publish in Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C Toxicology & Pharmacology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C Toxicology & Pharmacology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C Toxicology & Pharmacology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C Toxicology & Pharmacology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C Toxicology & Pharmacology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C Toxicology & Pharmacology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C Toxicology & Pharmacology.
About Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C Toxicology & Pharmacology
The 3.5k papers published in Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C Toxicology & Pharmacology in the last decades have received a total of 104.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C Toxicology & Pharmacology usually cover Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (1.5k papers), Physiology (345 papers), Aquatic Science (461 papers), Pollution (528 papers) and Aging (45 papers) specifically the topics of Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (1.2k papers), Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (431 papers), Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species (324 papers), Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (315 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (303 papers), Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts (255 papers), Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity (229 papers) and Trace Elements in Health (203 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C Toxicology & Pharmacology are Volodymyr I. Lushchak, Essam E. Enan, Patrick Payan, Gilles Bœuf, Tania Zenteno‐Savín, Helmut E. Segner, Chris M. Wood, François Gagné, Adalto Bianchini and Marcelo Hermes‐Lima.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.