Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology

870 papers and 3.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 870 papers published in Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology in the last decades have received a total of 3.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology usually cover Medical Laboratory Technology (228 papers), Biomedical Engineering (200 papers) and Surgery (164 papers) specifically the topics of Quality and Safety in Healthcare (228 papers), Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring (137 papers) and Biomedical and Engineering Education (94 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology are Maria Cvach, Joseph A Cafazzo, Tara McCurdie, Avinash Konkani, Svetlena Taneva, Melanie Yeung, Wayne Ho, Mark Casselman, Karen K. Giuliano and Judy Edworthy.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology.

Countries where authors publish in Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025