Biota Neopropica

1.4k papers and 20.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.4k papers published in Biota Neopropica in the last decades have received a total of 20.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Biota Neopropica usually cover Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (542 papers), Ecology (495 papers) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (486 papers) specifically the topics of Plant and animal studies (300 papers), Fish biology, ecology, and behavior (284 papers) and Amphibian and Reptile Biology (203 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Biota Neopropica are Lílian Casatti, Valéria Cid Maia, Denise de Cerqueira Rossa‐Feres, Ricardo J. Sawaya, Paulo Sérgio Bernarde, Francisco Langeani, Iván Sazima, A. Townsend Peterson, Adriano S. Melo and Ricardo Macedo Corrêa e Castro.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Biota Neopropica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Biota Neopropica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Biota Neopropica.

Countries where authors publish in Biota Neopropica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Biota Neopropica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Biota Neopropica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biota Neopropica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025