This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Bioimaging. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Bioimaging with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bioimaging more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Bioimaging. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Bioimaging.
About Bioimaging
The 202 papers published in Bioimaging in the last decades have received a total of 3.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Bioimaging usually cover Biophysics (82 papers), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (3 papers), Structural Biology (3 papers), Media Technology (17 papers) and Biomedical Engineering (70 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (67 papers), Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (36 papers), Cell Image Analysis Techniques (18 papers), Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (15 papers), Image Processing Techniques and Applications (14 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (10 papers), Near-Field Optical Microscopy (10 papers) and Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (9 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Bioimaging are Rudolf Rigler, Jerker Widengren, Stefan W. Hell, Kenneth R. Castleman, Colin J. R. Sheppard, Warren R. Zipfel, Watt W. Webb, Rebecca M. Williams, Chris Xu and Enrico Gratton.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.