Asian Journal of Law and Society

199 papers and 791 indexed citations i.

About

The 199 papers published in Asian Journal of Law and Society in the last decades have received a total of 791 indexed citations. Papers published in Asian Journal of Law and Society usually cover Political Science and International Relations (98 papers), Sociology and Political Science (96 papers) and Law (80 papers) specifically the topics of Judicial and Constitutional Studies (42 papers), Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (23 papers) and China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (22 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Asian Journal of Law and Society are Stefan Larsson, Ling Li, Lynette J. Chua, David T. Johnson, Sida Liu, Simon Butt, David Nelken, Kevin Kwok‐yin Cheng, Jaclyn L. Neo and Wang Juan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Asian Journal of Law and Society

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Asian Journal of Law and Society. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Asian Journal of Law and Society.

Countries where authors publish in Asian Journal of Law and Society

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Asian Journal of Law and Society. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Asian Journal of Law and Society with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Asian Journal of Law and Society more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025