Arthroscopy Techniques

3.0k papers and 19.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.0k papers published in Arthroscopy Techniques in the last decades have received a total of 19.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Arthroscopy Techniques usually cover Surgery (2.7k papers), Epidemiology (957 papers) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (945 papers) specifically the topics of Shoulder Injury and Treatment (1.5k papers), Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (1.1k papers) and Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries (893 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Arthroscopy Techniques are Tun Hing Lui, Jorge Chahla, Robert F. LaPrade, Benjamin G. Domb, Bertrand Sonnery‐Cottet, James H. Lubowitz, John M. Tokish, Gregory S. DiFelice, Jelle P. van der List and Chase S. Dean.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Arthroscopy Techniques

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Arthroscopy Techniques. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Arthroscopy Techniques.

Countries where authors publish in Arthroscopy Techniques

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Arthroscopy Techniques. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Arthroscopy Techniques with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arthroscopy Techniques more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025