Countries where authors publish in Arthroscopy Techniques
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Arthroscopy Techniques. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Arthroscopy Techniques with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arthroscopy Techniques more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Arthroscopy Techniques
This network shows the impact of papers published in Arthroscopy Techniques. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Arthroscopy Techniques.
About Arthroscopy Techniques
The 3.3k papers published in Arthroscopy Techniques in the last decades have received a total of 24.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Arthroscopy Techniques usually cover Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (1.1k papers), Surgery (3.0k papers), Rehabilitation (245 papers), Epidemiology (1.0k papers) and Rheumatology (319 papers) specifically the topics of Shoulder Injury and Treatment (1.7k papers), Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (1.2k papers), Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries (968 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (888 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (606 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (600 papers), Tendon Structure and Treatment (454 papers) and Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies (388 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Arthroscopy Techniques are Tun Hing Lui, Jorge Chahla, Robert F. LaPrade, Benjamin G. Domb, Bertrand Sonnery‐Cottet, James H. Lubowitz, Chase S. Dean, John M. Tokish, Gregory S. DiFelice and Jelle P. van der List.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.