Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine

1.8k papers and 16.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.8k papers published in Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 16.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine usually cover Surgery (550 papers), Rehabilitation (335 papers) and Psychiatry and Mental health (289 papers) specifically the topics of Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (318 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (213 papers) and Dysphagia Assessment and Management (161 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine are Min Ho Chun, Bo Ryun Kim, Joon‐Ho Shin, Sung‐Bom Pyun, Tai Ryoon Han, Kang Hee Cho, Min Kyun Sohn, Soo Jeong Han, Sook Joung Lee and Si Hyun Kang.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025