This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Archaeologies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Archaeologies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Archaeologies more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Archaeologies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Archaeologies.
About Archaeologies
The 415 papers published in Archaeologies in the last decades have received a total of 3.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Archaeologies usually cover Space and Planetary Science (101 papers), Archeology (33 papers), Anthropology (190 papers), Archeology (183 papers) and Paleontology (86 papers) specifically the topics of Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation (143 papers), Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies (104 papers), Archaeological Research and Protection (101 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (86 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (48 papers), Museums and Cultural Heritage (33 papers), Archaeology and Rock Art Studies (33 papers) and Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture (15 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Archaeologies are Lynn M. Meskell, Sonya Atalay, Yannis Hamilakis, Adria LaViolette, Colleen Morgan, Margaret W. Conkey, Alejandro F. Haber, Lesley Green, Morag M. Kersel and Reinhard Bernbeck.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.