Countries where authors publish in Aquatic Ecology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Aquatic Ecology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Aquatic Ecology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aquatic Ecology more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Aquatic Ecology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Aquatic Ecology.
About Aquatic Ecology
The 2.2k papers published in Aquatic Ecology in the last decades have received a total of 46.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Aquatic Ecology usually cover Environmental Chemistry (736 papers), Oceanography (695 papers), Ecology (1.3k papers), Nature and Landscape Conservation (557 papers) and Aquatic Science (147 papers) specifically the topics of Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics (648 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (490 papers), Marine and coastal ecosystems (398 papers), Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (386 papers), Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology (322 papers), Marine Biology and Ecology Research (273 papers), Marine and fisheries research (159 papers) and Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics (142 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Aquatic Ecology are Herman van Dam, Jos A. Sinkeldam, Adrienne Mertens, Florian Altermatt, James E. Cloern, Ramesh D. Gulati, Theo C. Prins, Sarma Nandini, Richard F. Dame and Michael Elliott.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.