Applications in Plant Sciences

871 papers and 10.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 871 papers published in Applications in Plant Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 10.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Applications in Plant Sciences usually cover Plant Science (421 papers), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (401 papers) and Genetics (400 papers) specifically the topics of Genetic diversity and population structure (379 papers), Plant and animal studies (193 papers) and Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (163 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Applications in Plant Sciences are Arnold J. Bloom, Hsien Ming Easlon, Quentin Cronk, Daisie Huang, Pamela S. Soltis, Matthew G. Johnson, Theresa M. Culley, Elliot M. Gardner, Roeland Kindt and Péter Poczai.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Applications in Plant Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Applications in Plant Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Applications in Plant Sciences.

Countries where authors publish in Applications in Plant Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Applications in Plant Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Applications in Plant Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Applications in Plant Sciences more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025