Arthropod-Plant Interactions

1.0k papers and 13.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.0k papers published in Arthropod-Plant Interactions in the last decades have received a total of 13.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Arthropod-Plant Interactions usually cover Insect Science (682 papers), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (650 papers) and Plant Science (641 papers) specifically the topics of Plant and animal studies (569 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (512 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (380 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Arthropod-Plant Interactions are Lars Chittka, Stanislav N. Gorb, Dagmar Voigt, Carl W. Wardhaugh, Thomas Döring, John F. Tooker, Sean A. Rands, Sarah E. J. Arnold, H. C. Sharma and Heather M. Whitney.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Arthropod-Plant Interactions

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Arthropod-Plant Interactions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Arthropod-Plant Interactions.

Countries where authors publish in Arthropod-Plant Interactions

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Arthropod-Plant Interactions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Arthropod-Plant Interactions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arthropod-Plant Interactions more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025