Anuario de Estudios Medievales

792 papers and 921 indexed citations i.

About

The 792 papers published in Anuario de Estudios Medievales in the last decades have received a total of 921 indexed citations. Papers published in Anuario de Estudios Medievales usually cover History (562 papers), Archeology (366 papers) and Classics (364 papers) specifically the topics of Medieval and Early Modern Iberia (433 papers), Medieval Iberian Studies (341 papers) and Medieval Architecture and Archaeology (215 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Anuario de Estudios Medievales are Miguel Ángel Ladero Quesada, Juan Torres Fontes, José Luis Martín Martín, José Luis Martín Rodríguez, Iñaki Martín Viso, Peter Linehan, James W. Brodman, Teresa Castro Martín, Maria Pérez and David Jacoby.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Anuario de Estudios Medievales

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Anuario de Estudios Medievales. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Anuario de Estudios Medievales.

Countries where authors publish in Anuario de Estudios Medievales

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Anuario de Estudios Medievales. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Anuario de Estudios Medievales with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anuario de Estudios Medievales more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025