Antiquités africaines

496 papers and 1.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 496 papers published in Antiquités africaines in the last decades have received a total of 1.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Antiquités africaines usually cover Archeology (297 papers), Anthropology (177 papers) and Language and Linguistics (63 papers) specifically the topics of Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (185 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (158 papers) and Archaeological and Historical Studies (120 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Antiquités africaines are Pol Trousset, Brent D. Shaw, Jacques Gascou, Gabriel Camps, Yann Le Bohec, David Mattingly, Michel Christol, Philippe Leveau, R. Bruce Hitchner and Michael P. Speidel.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Antiquités africaines

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Antiquités africaines. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Antiquités africaines.

Countries where authors publish in Antiquités africaines

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Antiquités africaines. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Antiquités africaines with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Antiquités africaines more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025