Countries where authors publish in Anatomy & Cell Biology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Anatomy & Cell Biology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Anatomy & Cell Biology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anatomy & Cell Biology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Anatomy & Cell Biology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Anatomy & Cell Biology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Anatomy & Cell Biology.
About Anatomy & Cell Biology
The 826 papers published in Anatomy & Cell Biology in the last decades have received a total of 8.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Anatomy & Cell Biology usually cover Developmental Neuroscience (30 papers), Surgery (310 papers), Anatomy (8 papers), Oral Surgery (38 papers) and Neurology (46 papers) specifically the topics of Peripheral Nerve Disorders (58 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (44 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (40 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (38 papers), Anatomy and Medical Technology (32 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (29 papers), Vascular anomalies and interventions (27 papers) and Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (25 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Anatomy & Cell Biology are Sanjib Kumar Ghosh, Pasuk Mahakkanukrauh, Jinu Kim, Kun Hwang, Juhyun Song, Richard Shane Tubbs, Joe Iwanaga, Sae‐Ock Oh, Hassan Azari and Rajani Singh.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.