Zhejiang International Studies University

31.6k citations
3.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Zhejiang International Studies University

2.1k papers receiving 28.2k citations

Peers

Zhejiang International Studies University
Comparison fields: 5 of 242
  • Cancer Research 1.8k
  • Modeling and Simulation 560
  • Biomaterials 1.2k
  • Health Informatics 125
  • Language and Linguistics 953
Replace Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University with:
Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University China
Soochow University Taiwan
Jiujiang University China
Providence University Taiwan
Fu Jen Catholic University Taiwan
Tunghai University Taiwan
National Chiayi University Taiwan
Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology Taiwan
National Changhua University of Education Taiwan
National Dong Hwa University Taiwan
Zhejiang International Studies University relative to Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University China Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Zhejiang International Studies University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Zhejiang International Studies University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Zhejiang International Studies University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zhejiang International Studies University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Zhejiang International Studies University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Zhejiang International Studies University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Zhejiang International Studies University at the time of their publication.

About Zhejiang International Studies University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Zhejiang International Studies University have published 3.1k papers, which have received a total of 31.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 161 papers in Language and Linguistics, 65 papers in Human-Computer Interaction, 137 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 137 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 50 papers in Linguistics and Language on the topics of Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (76 papers), Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (75 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (66 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (53 papers), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (52 papers), Second Language Learning and Teaching (51 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (50 papers) and Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (42 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Cancer Research (1.8k citations), Modeling and Simulation (560 citations), Biomaterials (1.2k citations), Health Informatics (125 citations) and Language and Linguistics (953 citations). Authors at Zhejiang International Studies University collaborate with scholars in China, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Frontiers in Psychology, Advanced Materials, Scientific Reports, Nature Communications and Sustainability. Some of Zhejiang International Studies University's most productive authors include Jie Hu, Yu Yang, Jun Yu, Haitao Liu, Jian Zhang, Zhongru Gou, Biaoyang Lin, Yongfeng Jin, Le Cheng and Xianyan Yang.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact