Wright Laboratory

160.6k citations
5.3k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Wright Laboratory

5.1k papers receiving 160.2k citations

Peers

Wright Laboratory
Comparison fields: 5 of 234
  • Computational Mechanics 18.8k
  • Aerospace Engineering 17.2k
  • Materials Chemistry 27.8k
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 10.8k
  • Mechanics of Materials 14k
Replace Ford Motor Company (United States) with:
Ford Motor Company (United States) United States
Westinghouse Electric (United States) United States
University of Dayton Research Institute United States
Rockwell International (United States) United States
Advanced Photon Source
United States Air Force Research Laboratory United States
DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory United States
U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory Materials and Manufacturing Directorate
Glenn Research Center United States
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base United States
Wright Laboratory relative to Ford Motor Company (United States) United States Ford Motor Company (United States)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Ford Motor Company (United States) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Wright Laboratory

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Wright Laboratory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Wright Laboratory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wright Laboratory more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Wright Laboratory

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Wright Laboratory at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Wright Laboratory at the time of their publication.

About Wright Laboratory

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Wright Laboratory have published 5.3k papers, which have received a total of 160.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 8 papers in Nuclear Energy and Engineering, 864 papers in Aerospace Engineering, 703 papers in Computational Mechanics, 511 papers in Mechanics of Materials and 118 papers in Ceramics and Composites on the topics of Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (390 papers), Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control (209 papers), Mechanical Behavior of Composites (187 papers), Semiconductor materials and interfaces (182 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (157 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (150 papers), Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties (135 papers) and Combustion and flame dynamics (131 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Computational Mechanics (18.8k citations), Aerospace Engineering (17.2k citations), Materials Chemistry (27.8k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (10.8k citations) and Mechanics of Materials (14k citations). Authors at Wright Laboratory collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and South Korea and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Applied Physics, AIAA Journal, Applied Physics Letters, Journal of Aircraft and Journal of Propulsion and Power. Some of Wright Laboratory's most productive authors include Miguel R. Visbal, Daniel B. Miracle, Richard A. Vaia, Saber M. Hussain, Donald P. Rizzetta, Datta V. Gaitonde, Rajesh R. Naik, Jeffrey S. Zabinski, Loon‐Seng Tan and Paras N. Prasad.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact