Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities
Impact in
- Health Informatics top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Papers in
-
- Ethics in Clinical Research 194
- Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues 76
- Top scholars
- Julian SavulescuLuciano FloridiDominic WilkinsonMichael ParkerGuy KahaneAngeliki KerasidouThomas DouglasBrian D. Earp
- Journals
- Journal of Medical Ethics (148 papers)Bioethics (67 papers)BMC Medical Ethics (60 papers)Neuroethics (34 papers)European Journal of Human Genetics (28 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities
1.4k papers receiving 40.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 236
- Health Informatics 1.3k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 7.0k
- Modeling and Simulation 1.4k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 7.9k
- Health 2.1k
Countries citing scholars working at Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities at the time of their publication.
About Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities have published 1.6k papers, which have received a total of 47.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 47 papers in Health Informatics, 407 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 296 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 324 papers in General Health Professions and 238 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health on the topics of Ethics in Clinical Research (194 papers), Ethics in medical practice (194 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (173 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (161 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (136 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (105 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (76 papers) and Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (68 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Health Informatics (1.3k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (7.0k citations), Modeling and Simulation (1.4k citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (7.9k citations) and Health (2.1k citations). Authors at Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, Australia and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Medical Ethics, Bioethics, BMC Medical Ethics, Neuroethics and European Journal of Human Genetics. Some of Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities's most productive authors include Julian Savulescu, Luciano Floridi, Dominic Wilkinson, Michael Parker, Guy Kahane, Angeliki Kerasidou, Thomas Douglas, Brian D. Earp, Tony Hope and Alberto Giubilini.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.