Wake Forest University

2.3M citations
55.7k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Wake Forest University

52.9k papers receiving 2.3M citations

Peers

Wake Forest University
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 176.4k
  • Physiology 160k
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 20k
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 91.2k
  • Aging 7.8k
Replace University of Virginia with:
University of Virginia United States
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill United States
Duke University United States
University of Maryland, Baltimore United States
Virginia Commonwealth University United States
Emory University United States
Case Western Reserve University United States
University of Cincinnati United States
University of Kentucky United States
Vanderbilt University United States
Wake Forest University relative to University of Virginia United States University of Virginia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
University of Virginia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Wake Forest University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Wake Forest University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Wake Forest University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wake Forest University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Wake Forest University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Wake Forest University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Wake Forest University at the time of their publication.

About Wake Forest University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Wake Forest University have published 55.7k papers, which have received a total of 2.3M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 4k papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 3.3k papers in Physiology, 1k papers in Dermatology, 5.2k papers in Surgery and 3.3k papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine on the topics of Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (909 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (888 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (724 papers), Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (561 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (558 papers), Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism (555 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (534 papers) and Renin-Angiotensin System Studies (528 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (176.4k citations), Physiology (160k citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (20k citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (91.2k citations) and Aging (7.8k citations). Authors at Wake Forest University collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Anesthesiology, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology and The Journals of Gerontology Series A. Some of Wake Forest University's most productive authors include Anthony Atala, Mark R. Leary, Steven R. Feldman, Ronald W. Oppenheim, Dalane W. Kitzman, Carlos Maria Ferrario, Stephen B. Kritchevsky, Richard F. Loeser, Leslie B. Poole and James C. Eisenach.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact