D.I. Mendeleyev Institute for Metrology
Impact in
-
- Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
-
- Atomic and Molecular Physics
- Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
- Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect
Papers in
-
- Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation 241
- Radiation 133
- Radioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques 100
- Top scholars
- Savely G. KarshenboimValery A. ShelyutoMichael I. EidesB. L. MilmanH. GrotchV. G. IvanovN. N. TrunovV. M. Mostepanenko
- Journals
- Metrologia (94 papers)IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement (29 papers)Physical Review A (17 papers)Applied Radiation and Isotopes (16 papers)Physics Letters B (15 papers)
- Partner nations
- RussiaGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
D.I. Mendeleyev Institute for Metrology
748 papers receiving 6.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 165
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 1.3k
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 3.4k
- Radiation 918
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 1.4k
- Mechanics of Materials 1.0k
Countries citing scholars working at D.I. Mendeleyev Institute for Metrology
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at D.I. Mendeleyev Institute for Metrology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at D.I. Mendeleyev Institute for Metrology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D.I. Mendeleyev Institute for Metrology more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at D.I. Mendeleyev Institute for Metrology
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with D.I. Mendeleyev Institute for Metrology at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with D.I. Mendeleyev Institute for Metrology at the time of their publication.
About D.I. Mendeleyev Institute for Metrology
In recent decades, authors affiliated with D.I. Mendeleyev Institute for Metrology have published 950 papers, which have received a total of 7.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 242 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 133 papers in Radiation, 199 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 29 papers in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and 135 papers in Aerospace Engineering on the topics of Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation (241 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (109 papers), Radioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques (100 papers), Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure (94 papers), Advanced Electrical Measurement Techniques (94 papers), Calibration and Measurement Techniques (86 papers), Sensor Technology and Measurement Systems (76 papers) and Advanced Sensor Technologies Research (55 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (1.3k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (3.4k citations), Radiation (918 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (1.4k citations) and Mechanics of Materials (1.0k citations). Authors at D.I. Mendeleyev Institute for Metrology collaborate with scholars in Russia, Germany and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Metrologia, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Physical Review A, Applied Radiation and Isotopes and Physics Letters B. Some of D.I. Mendeleyev Institute for Metrology's most productive authors include Savely G. Karshenboim, Valery A. Shelyuto, Michael I. Eides, B. L. Milman, H. Grotch, V. G. Ivanov, N. N. Trunov, V. M. Mostepanenko, R. L. Znajek and F. F. Karpeshin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.