The University of Texas at El Paso

18.7k papers receiving 463.4k citations

Peers

The University of Texas at El Paso
Comparison fields: 5 of 251
  • Automotive Engineering 23.1k
  • Metals and Alloys 4.7k
  • Materials Chemistry 74.1k
  • Geophysics 18.1k
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 7.8k
Replace University of New Mexico with:
University of New Mexico United States
Texas Tech University United States
Brigham Young University United States
University of North Texas United States
Colorado State University United States
University of Oklahoma United States
Oklahoma State University United States
The University of Texas at Arlington United States
Southern Methodist University United States
The University of Texas at Dallas United States
The University of Texas at El Paso relative to University of New Mexico United States University of New Mexico's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10.6×
University of New Mexico · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at The University of Texas at El Paso

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at The University of Texas at El Paso. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at The University of Texas at El Paso with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The University of Texas at El Paso more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at The University of Texas at El Paso

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with The University of Texas at El Paso at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with The University of Texas at El Paso at the time of their publication.

About The University of Texas at El Paso

In recent decades, authors affiliated with The University of Texas at El Paso have published 21.4k papers, which have received a total of 501.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 190 papers in Metals and Alloys, 98 papers in Architecture, 725 papers in Geophysics, 453 papers in Statistics and Probability and 821 papers in Computational Theory and Mathematics on the topics of Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels (503 papers), Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies (379 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (341 papers), Metal Alloys Wear and Properties (324 papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (309 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (302 papers), Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes (218 papers) and Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (217 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Automotive Engineering (23.1k citations), Metals and Alloys (4.7k citations), Materials Chemistry (74.1k citations), Geophysics (18.1k citations) and Geochemistry and Petrology (7.8k citations). Authors at The University of Texas at El Paso collaborate with scholars in United States, China and Mexico and have published in prestigious journals including Materials Science and Engineering A, PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports, Materials Characterization and The Science of The Total Environment. Some of The University of Texas at El Paso's most productive authors include Jorge Luis Gardea-Torresdey, Lawrence E. Murr, José R. Peralta-Videa, Ryan B. Wicker, Edward M. Heath, Vladik Ya Kreinovich, R.D.K. Misra, Chintalapalle V Ramana, Michael Gelfond and Joe Tomaka.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact