United States Marine Corps

595 papers receiving 9.0k citations

Peers

United States Marine Corps
Comparison fields: 5 of 234
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 257
  • Emergency Medicine 447
  • Occupational Therapy 212
  • Oceanography 669
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 678
Replace University of Maryland Extension with:
University of Maryland Extension United States
United States Army Reserve United States
InterScience (United States) United States
RELX Group (United States) United States
Shepherd University United States
Hyattsville Community Development Corporation United States
United States Coast Guard United States
Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command United States
Institut du Savoir Montfort Canada
Orange County School United States
United States Marine Corps relative to University of Maryland Extension United States University of Maryland Extension's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.0×
University of Maryland Extension · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at United States Marine Corps

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at United States Marine Corps. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at United States Marine Corps with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites United States Marine Corps more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at United States Marine Corps

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with United States Marine Corps at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with United States Marine Corps at the time of their publication.

About United States Marine Corps

In recent decades, authors affiliated with United States Marine Corps have published 739 papers, which have received a total of 10.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 28 papers in Occupational Therapy, 17 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, 23 papers in Emergency Medical Services, 25 papers in Earth-Surface Processes and 39 papers in Oceanography on the topics of Occupational Health and Performance (28 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (22 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (21 papers), Defense, Military, and Policy Studies (19 papers), Disaster Response and Management (16 papers), Marine and fisheries research (14 papers), Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (14 papers) and Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies (14 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (257 citations), Emergency Medicine (447 citations), Occupational Therapy (212 citations), Oceanography (669 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (678 citations). Authors at United States Marine Corps collaborate with scholars in United States, France and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Military Medicine, SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series, The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, The Journal of the American Dental Association and Ophthalmologica. Some of United States Marine Corps's most productive authors include Jasmin Arrich, Joseph S. Gondusky, William P. Nash, Brett T. Litz, Harris J. Keene, Michael Tedengren, Nils Kautsky, Kerstin Johannesson, Lars Reutergårdh and Pim de Voogt.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact