UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology

9.2k papers receiving 541.1k citations

Peers

UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology
Comparison fields: 5 of 240
  • Ecological Modeling 16.9k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 61.9k
  • Environmental Chemistry 42.4k
  • Global and Planetary Change 95.6k
  • Ecology 101.1k
Replace Rothamsted Research with:
Rothamsted Research United Kingdom
Natural History Museum United Kingdom
Natural Environment Research Council United Kingdom
AgroParisTech France
Ifremer France
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement France
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement France
Netherlands Institute of Ecology Netherlands
Institut National de Recherche en Sciences et Technologies pour l'Environnement et l'Agriculture France
National Oceanography Centre United Kingdom
UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology relative to Rothamsted Research United Kingdom Rothamsted Research's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.2×
Rothamsted Research · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology at the time of their publication.

About UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology

In recent decades, authors affiliated with UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology have published 9.5k papers, which have received a total of 541.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 281 papers in Ecological Modeling, 1.2k papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 853 papers in Environmental Chemistry, 1.8k papers in Global and Planetary Change and 1.8k papers in Ecology on the topics of Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (907 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (696 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (517 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (516 papers), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (504 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (466 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (403 papers) and Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (342 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (16.9k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (61.9k citations), Environmental Chemistry (42.4k citations), Global and Planetary Change (95.6k citations) and Ecology (101.1k citations). Authors at UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including The Science of The Total Environment, Environmental Pollution, Hydrology and earth system sciences, Global Change Biology and Journal of Applied Ecology. Some of UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology's most productive authors include James M. Bullock, David B. Roy, Chris Huntingford, Mark A. Sutton, Ian Newton, Edward Tipping, Philip Eric Hulme, Andrew C. Johnson, Peter M. Cox and Chris D. Thomas.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact