University Grants Commission

372 papers receiving 7.5k citations

Peers

University Grants Commission
Comparison fields: 5 of 219
  • Soil Science 601
  • Waste Management and Disposal 359
  • Materials Chemistry 1.7k
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 583
  • Parasitology 201
Replace Ministry of Science and Technology with:
Ministry of Science and Technology India
Indian Institute of Advanced Research India
ICMR National Institute for Research in Environmental Health India
Awadhesh Pratap Singh University India
Hemchandracharya North Gujarat University India
National Institute of Health and Family Welfare India
National Academy of Sciences India India
Meerut College India
Maharshi Dayanand Saraswati University India
National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies India
University Grants Commission relative to Ministry of Science and Technology India Ministry of Science and Technology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.2×
Ministry of Science and Technology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University Grants Commission

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University Grants Commission. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University Grants Commission with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University Grants Commission more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University Grants Commission

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University Grants Commission at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University Grants Commission at the time of their publication.

About University Grants Commission

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University Grants Commission have published 432 papers, which have received a total of 7.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 4 papers in Library and Information Sciences, 9 papers in Developmental Neuroscience, 71 papers in Materials Chemistry, 19 papers in Biomaterials and 24 papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials on the topics of Copper-based nanomaterials and applications (21 papers), ZnO doping and properties (16 papers), Thermoelastic and Magnetoelastic Phenomena (13 papers), Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials (13 papers), Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films (13 papers), Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties (12 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (9 papers) and Agricultural Economics and Practices (9 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Soil Science (601 citations), Waste Management and Disposal (359 citations), Materials Chemistry (1.7k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (583 citations) and Parasitology (201 citations). Authors at University Grants Commission collaborate with scholars in India, United States and Japan and have published in prestigious journals including Mycopathologia, physica status solidi (b), ACS Applied Bio Materials, New Journal of Chemistry and Journal of Materials Science Materials in Electronics. Some of University Grants Commission's most productive authors include Mahesh Kandasamy, Vikas Srivastava, Nuggehalli M. Ravindra, S. Auluck, D.B. Gammack, P. S. Bundela, Mukesh Kumar Awasthi, Jamaluddin Khan, Sukhadeo Thorat and Peter G. Sargeaunt.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact