Tea Research Association

10.9k citations
552 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Tea Research Association

488 papers receiving 10.2k citations

Peers

Tea Research Association
Comparison fields: 5 of 183
  • Biochemistry 1.0k
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 2.7k
  • Analytical Chemistry 1.4k
  • Plant Science 3.2k
  • Waste Management and Disposal 725
Replace Institute of Bio-Resources and Sustainable Development with:
Institute of Bio-Resources and Sustainable Development India
Defence Research Laboratory India
Puer University China
Jashore University of Science and Technology Bangladesh
China Tobacco Yunnan Industrial Co., Ltd. (China) China
Veterinary & Animal Husbandry India
University of Science and Technology, Meghalaya India
Primeasia University Bangladesh
ICAR-Indian Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology India
Yunnan Academy of Forestry China
Tea Research Association relative to Institute of Bio-Resources and Sustainable Development India Institute of Bio-Resources and Sustainable Development's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×14.5×
Institute of Bio-Resources and Sustainable Development · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Tea Research Association

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Tea Research Association. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Tea Research Association with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tea Research Association more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Tea Research Association

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Tea Research Association at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Tea Research Association at the time of their publication.

About Tea Research Association

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Tea Research Association have published 552 papers, which have received a total of 10.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 106 papers in Insect Science, 140 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine, 65 papers in Analytical Chemistry, 37 papers in Biochemistry and 215 papers in Plant Science on the topics of Tea Polyphenols and Effects (139 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (64 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (61 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (47 papers), Heavy Metals in Plants (45 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (37 papers), Heavy metals in environment (36 papers) and Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (35 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Biochemistry (1.0k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (2.7k citations), Analytical Chemistry (1.4k citations), Plant Science (3.2k citations) and Waste Management and Disposal (725 citations). Authors at Tea Research Association collaborate with scholars in India, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, Nature, IEEE Sensors Journal, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment and International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. Some of Tea Research Association's most productive authors include E. A. H. Roberts, Tanmoy Karak, Rajib Mohan Bhagat, Abhay Kumar Pandey, David Wood, Pradip Bhattacharyya, Azariah Babu, Somnath Roy, Pradip Tamuly and Pradip Kr Mahanta.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact