Tasmanian Land Conservancy

9.5k citations
467 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Tasmanian Land Conservancy

407 papers receiving 8.7k citations

Peers

Tasmanian Land Conservancy
Comparison fields: 5 of 217
  • Ecological Modeling 397
  • Ecology 2.2k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 939
  • Global and Planetary Change 1.5k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 870
Replace Bush Heritage Australia with:
Bush Heritage Australia Australia
Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research Australia
Murray Darling Basin Authority Australia
Cambia Australia
Sinclair Dermatology Australia
Ellinbank Observatory Australia
Government of New South Wales Australia
Department for Environment and Water Australia
Calvary Riverina Hospital Australia
BirdLife Australia Australia
Tasmanian Land Conservancy relative to Bush Heritage Australia Australia Bush Heritage Australia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Bush Heritage Australia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Tasmanian Land Conservancy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Tasmanian Land Conservancy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Tasmanian Land Conservancy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tasmanian Land Conservancy more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Tasmanian Land Conservancy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Tasmanian Land Conservancy at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Tasmanian Land Conservancy at the time of their publication.

About Tasmanian Land Conservancy

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Tasmanian Land Conservancy have published 467 papers, which have received a total of 9.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 26 papers in Ecological Modeling, 54 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 112 papers in Ecology, 70 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 63 papers in Global and Planetary Change on the topics of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (56 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (26 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (23 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (20 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (20 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (18 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (16 papers) and Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (15 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (397 citations), Ecology (2.2k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (939 citations), Global and Planetary Change (1.5k citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (870 citations). Authors at Tasmanian Land Conservancy collaborate with scholars in Australia, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Wildlife Research, Papers and proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania, The Lichenologist, Emu - Austral Ornithology and Australian Journal of Zoology. Some of Tasmanian Land Conservancy's most productive authors include H. V. Cane, Anthony J. Fist, William C. Erickson, David John Woods, Belinda S. Fazekas, David C. Currow, Amy P. Abernethy, Tania Shelby‐James, Philip J. Larkin and Melody Serena.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact