Taiwan Forestry Research Institute
Impact in
- Plant Science top 10%
-
- Plant and animal studies
- Plant Diversity and Evolution
- Fern and Epiphyte Biology
Papers in
-
- Plant Diversity and Evolution 148
- Plant and animal studies 144
- Fern and Epiphyte Biology 114
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 94
- Forest ecology and management 67
- Top scholars
- Shang‐Tzen ChangChen‐Lung HoTsan‐Piao LinChing‐Te ChienYu‐Chang SuTing‐Shou ChangWen‐Liang ChiouTeng‐Chiu Lin
- Journals
- Phytotaxa (47 papers)Natural Product Communications (46 papers)Botanical studies (23 papers)Scientific Reports (21 papers)PLoS ONE (19 papers)
- Partner nations
- TaiwanUnited StatesJapan
In The Last Decade
Taiwan Forestry Research Institute
1.3k papers receiving 23.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 220
- Plant Science 7.7k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 4.0k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 2.3k
- Ecological Modeling 723
- Horticulture 124
Countries citing scholars working at Taiwan Forestry Research Institute
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Taiwan Forestry Research Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Taiwan Forestry Research Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Taiwan Forestry Research Institute more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Taiwan Forestry Research Institute
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Taiwan Forestry Research Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Taiwan Forestry Research Institute at the time of their publication.
About Taiwan Forestry Research Institute
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Taiwan Forestry Research Institute have published 1.4k papers, which have received a total of 24.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 356 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 159 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 52 papers in Ecological Modeling, 413 papers in Plant Science and 45 papers in Biochemistry on the topics of Plant Diversity and Evolution (148 papers), Plant and animal studies (144 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (127 papers), Fern and Epiphyte Biology (114 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (96 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (94 papers), Forest ecology and management (67 papers) and Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (61 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Plant Science (7.7k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (4.0k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (2.3k citations), Ecological Modeling (723 citations) and Horticulture (124 citations). Authors at Taiwan Forestry Research Institute collaborate with scholars in Taiwan, United States and Japan and have published in prestigious journals including Phytotaxa, Natural Product Communications, Botanical studies, Scientific Reports and PLoS ONE. Some of Taiwan Forestry Research Institute's most productive authors include Shang‐Tzen Chang, Chen‐Lung Ho, Tsan‐Piao Lin, Ching‐Te Chien, Yu‐Chang Su, Ting‐Shou Chang, Wen‐Liang Chiou, Teng‐Chiu Lin, Hao‐Chung Kuo and Tun‐Tschu Chang.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.