Tanzania Forestry Research Institute

4.6k citations
316 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Tanzania Forestry Research Institute

261 papers receiving 4.3k citations

Peers

Tanzania Forestry Research Institute
Comparison fields: 5 of 163
  • Forestry 566
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 795
  • Global and Planetary Change 1.3k
  • Horticulture 58
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 284
Replace Kenya Forest Service with:
Kenya Forest Service Kenya
Ministry of Agriculture, Food Security and Cooperatives Tanzania
WWF Tanzania Tanzania
CABI Kenya Kenya
Kenya Forestry Research Institute Kenya
African Conservation Centre Kenya
Tropical Pesticides Research Institute Tanzania
Sino-Africa Joint Research Center China
BirdLife International Kenya
International Potato Center Kenya
Tanzania Forestry Research Institute relative to Kenya Forest Service Kenya Kenya Forest Service's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Kenya Forest Service · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Tanzania Forestry Research Institute

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Tanzania Forestry Research Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Tanzania Forestry Research Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tanzania Forestry Research Institute more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Tanzania Forestry Research Institute

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Tanzania Forestry Research Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Tanzania Forestry Research Institute at the time of their publication.

About Tanzania Forestry Research Institute

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Tanzania Forestry Research Institute have published 316 papers, which have received a total of 4.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 57 papers in Forestry, 57 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 74 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 33 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science and 3 papers in Horticulture on the topics of Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (52 papers), African Botany and Ecology Studies (51 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (34 papers), Forest ecology and management (32 papers), Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (27 papers), Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (25 papers), Forest Management and Policy (22 papers) and Agricultural Innovations and Practices (21 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Forestry (566 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (795 citations), Global and Planetary Change (1.3k citations), Horticulture (58 citations) and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (284 citations). Authors at Tanzania Forestry Research Institute collaborate with scholars in Tanzania, South Africa and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Forest Ecology and Management, Agroforestry Systems, The International Forestry Review, Forest Policy and Economics and Journal of Sustainable Forestry. Some of Tanzania Forestry Research Institute's most productive authors include Kunihiko Samejima, Robert L. Henrickson, Ali Asghar, Gufu Oba, Richard A. Giliba (PhD), Jafari R. Kideghesho, Rogers Ernest Malimbwi, C.D.K. Rubanza, Eliakimu Mnkondo Zahabu and Canisius John Kayombo.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact