Savoirs, Textes, Langage

7.2k citations
1.4k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation 152
    • Historical Linguistics and Language Studies 133
    • Linguistics and Discourse Analysis 270
    • Classical Philosophy and Thought 80

Savoirs, Textes, Langage

952 papers receiving 6.4k citations

Peers

Savoirs, Textes, Langage
Comparison fields: 5 of 169
  • Language and Linguistics 3.2k
  • Linguistics and Language 1.2k
  • Philosophy 1.7k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.5k
  • Theoretical Computer Science 94
Replace Cambridge University Press with:
Cambridge University Press United Kingdom
Institut Jean Nicod France
Interactions, Corpus, Apprentissages, Représentations France
University of Erfurt Germany
Laboratoire de Linguistique Formelle France
Institut National des Langues et Civilisations Orientales France
Amsterdam University of the Arts Netherlands
Institut für Urheber- und Medienrecht Germany
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Germany
York St John University United Kingdom
Savoirs, Textes, Langage relative to Cambridge University Press United Kingdom Cambridge University Press's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Cambridge University Press · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Savoirs, Textes, Langage

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Savoirs, Textes, Langage. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Savoirs, Textes, Langage with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Savoirs, Textes, Langage more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Savoirs, Textes, Langage

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Savoirs, Textes, Langage at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Savoirs, Textes, Langage at the time of their publication.

About Savoirs, Textes, Langage

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Savoirs, Textes, Langage have published 1.4k papers, which have received a total of 7.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 440 papers in Language and Linguistics, 451 papers in Philosophy, 170 papers in Linguistics and Language, 106 papers in History and Philosophy of Science and 202 papers in Anthropology on the topics of Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (270 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (152 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (149 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (143 papers), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (133 papers), French Language Learning Methods (98 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (87 papers) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (80 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Language and Linguistics (3.2k citations), Linguistics and Language (1.2k citations), Philosophy (1.7k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.5k citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (94 citations). Authors at Savoirs, Textes, Langage collaborate with scholars in France, Belgium and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Langue française, Folia Linguistica, Linguistics, English Language and Linguistics and History and Philosophy of Logic. Some of Savoirs, Textes, Langage's most productive authors include Liliane Haegeman, Ruth Webb, Ilse Depraetere, Shahid Rahman, Anne Carlier, Rudy Loock, Bert Cappelle, Pierre Macherey, Melita Stavrou and Artemis Alexiadou.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact