Stanford Medicine

2.1M citations
41.8k papers ·

Impact in

  • Immunology top 0.5%
    • Immune Cell Function and Interaction
    • T-cell and B-cell Immunology
    • Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
    • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation

Papers in

Stanford Medicine

35.1k papers receiving 1.8M citations

Peers

Stanford Medicine
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Immunology 142.0k
  • Molecular Biology 419.0k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 114.1k
  • Oncology 141.0k
  • Developmental Neuroscience 21.4k
Replace University of Southern California with:
University of Southern California United States
University of California, Irvine United States
University of California System United States
University of San Francisco United States
UCLA Health United States
Palo Alto University United States
University of California, Riverside United States
University of Utah United States
Seattle University United States
University of California, San Francisco United States
Stanford Medicine relative to University of Southern California United States University of Southern California's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
University of Southern California · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Stanford Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Stanford Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Stanford Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stanford Medicine more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Stanford Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Stanford Medicine at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Stanford Medicine at the time of their publication.

About Stanford Medicine

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Stanford Medicine have published 41.8k papers, which have received a total of 2.1M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 5.6k papers in Surgery, 3.6k papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 2.3k papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 2.4k papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 151 papers in Health Informatics on the topics of Immune Cell Function and Interaction (609 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (601 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (539 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (491 papers), Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (450 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (435 papers), Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (412 papers) and CAR-T cell therapy research (400 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Immunology (142.0k citations), Molecular Biology (419.0k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (114.1k citations), Oncology (141.0k citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (21.4k citations). Authors at Stanford Medicine collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Nature Communications, Blood, Scientific Reports, The Journal of Immunology and Journal of Clinical Oncology. Some of Stanford Medicine's most productive authors include James J. Gross, Gerald M. Reaven, Irving L. Weissman, Vinod Menon, Albert Bandura, Maurice M. Ohayon, Kenneth J. Arrow, Eugene C. Butcher, Claude M. Steele and Gary H. Glover.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact