National Board of Health and Welfare
Impact in
- Medical Laboratory Technology top 0.5%
-
- Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
- Birth, Development, and Health
Papers in
-
- Air Quality and Health Impacts 46
- Top scholars
- Anders HjernPetra Otterblad OlaussonBengt A.J. KällénJonas Filip LudvigssonÅsa KilbomMåns RosénBo VinnerljungBjörn G. Jonsson
- Journals
- Scandinavian Journal of Public Health (52 papers)Acta Paediatrica (48 papers)European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (39 papers)Contact Dermatitis (39 papers)Acta Oncologica (34 papers)
- Partner nations
- SwedenUnited StatesDenmark
In The Last Decade
National Board of Health and Welfare
1.6k papers receiving 64.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 237
- Medical Laboratory Technology 1.4k
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 8.0k
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 3.0k
- Chemical Health and Safety 281
- Pharmacology 6.1k
Countries citing scholars working at National Board of Health and Welfare
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Board of Health and Welfare. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Board of Health and Welfare with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Board of Health and Welfare more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Board of Health and Welfare
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Board of Health and Welfare at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Board of Health and Welfare at the time of their publication.
About National Board of Health and Welfare
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Board of Health and Welfare have published 1.9k papers, which have received a total of 90.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 14 papers in Chemical Health and Safety, 134 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, 162 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 2 papers in Medical Terminology and 25 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology on the topics of Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (59 papers), Contact Dermatitis and Allergies (50 papers), Occupational exposure and asthma (48 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (46 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (46 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (42 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (39 papers) and Occupational and environmental lung diseases (39 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Medical Laboratory Technology (1.4k citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (8.0k citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (3.0k citations), Chemical Health and Safety (281 citations) and Pharmacology (6.1k citations). Authors at National Board of Health and Welfare collaborate with scholars in Sweden, United States and Denmark and have published in prestigious journals including Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, Acta Paediatrica, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Contact Dermatitis and Acta Oncologica. Some of National Board of Health and Welfare's most productive authors include Anders Hjern, Petra Otterblad Olausson, Bengt A.J. Källén, Jonas Filip Ludvigsson, Åsa Kilbom, Måns Rosén, Bo Vinnerljung, Björn G. Jonsson, Bengt Haglund and Maria Feychting.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.