Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences
Impact in
- Drug Discovery top 5%
Papers in
-
- Medicinal Plant Extracts Effects 61
- Nephrology 146
- Top scholars
- Mahmoud Rafieian‐KopaeiHamid NasriHedayatollah ShirzadAzar BaradaranZahra LorigooiniMahmoud BahmaniSorayya GhasemiHossein Amini-Khoei
- Journals
- Scientific Reports (35 papers)Heliyon (29 papers)Molecular Biology Reports (29 papers)Current Pharmaceutical Design (27 papers)International Journal of Biological Macromolecules (22 papers)
- Partner nations
- IranUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences
4.3k papers receiving 66.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 227
- Drug Discovery 139
- Complementary and alternative medicine 3.5k
- Biochemistry 1.9k
- Rehabilitation 1.5k
- Biological Psychiatry 312
Countries citing scholars working at Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences at the time of their publication.
About Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences have published 4.6k papers, which have received a total of 66.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 176 papers in Complementary and alternative medicine, 146 papers in Nephrology, 76 papers in Sensory Systems, 242 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 19 papers in Biological Psychiatry on the topics of Medicinal Plant Research (110 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (75 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (74 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (71 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (61 papers), Medicinal Plant Extracts Effects (61 papers), Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies (60 papers) and Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies (60 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Drug Discovery (139 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (3.5k citations), Biochemistry (1.9k citations), Rehabilitation (1.5k citations) and Biological Psychiatry (312 citations). Authors at Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences collaborate with scholars in Iran, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Scientific Reports, Heliyon, Molecular Biology Reports, Current Pharmaceutical Design and International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. Some of Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences's most productive authors include Mahmoud Rafieian‐Kopaei, Hamid Nasri, Hedayatollah Shirzad, Azar Baradaran, Zahra Lorigooini, Mahmoud Bahmani, Sorayya Ghasemi, Hossein Amini-Khoei, Esfandiar Heidarian and Majid Asadi-Samani.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.