Shanghai Key Laboratory for Urban Ecological Processes and Eco-Restoration
Impact in
- Pollution top 5%
- Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
- Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
-
- Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
Papers in
- Pollution 214
- Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal 80
- Microplastics and Plastic Pollution 61
Shanghai Key Laboratory for Urban Ecological Processes and Eco-Restoration
1.1k papers receiving 46.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 215
- Pollution 12.6k
- Waste Management and Disposal 7.8k
- Environmental Engineering 7.8k
- Water Science and Technology 6.9k
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 6.6k
Countries citing scholars working at Shanghai Key Laboratory for Urban Ecological Processes and Eco-Restoration
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Shanghai Key Laboratory for Urban Ecological Processes and Eco-Restoration. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Shanghai Key Laboratory for Urban Ecological Processes and Eco-Restoration with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shanghai Key Laboratory for Urban Ecological Processes and Eco-Restoration more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Shanghai Key Laboratory for Urban Ecological Processes and Eco-Restoration
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Shanghai Key Laboratory for Urban Ecological Processes and Eco-Restoration at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Shanghai Key Laboratory for Urban Ecological Processes and Eco-Restoration at the time of their publication.
About Shanghai Key Laboratory for Urban Ecological Processes and Eco-Restoration
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Shanghai Key Laboratory for Urban Ecological Processes and Eco-Restoration have published 1.1k papers, which have received a total of 48.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 214 papers in Pollution, 119 papers in Waste Management and Disposal, 170 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, 181 papers in Environmental Engineering and 150 papers in Water Science and Technology on the topics of Land Use and Ecosystem Services (101 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (83 papers), Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal (80 papers), Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation (78 papers), Advanced oxidation water treatment (75 papers), Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques (64 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (64 papers) and Microplastics and Plastic Pollution (61 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Pollution (12.6k citations), Waste Management and Disposal (7.8k citations), Environmental Engineering (7.8k citations), Water Science and Technology (6.9k citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (6.6k citations). Authors at Shanghai Key Laboratory for Urban Ecological Processes and Eco-Restoration collaborate with scholars in China, United States and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including The Science of The Total Environment, Journal of Hazardous Materials, Bioresource Technology, Chemical Engineering Journal and Chemosphere. Some of Shanghai Key Laboratory for Urban Ecological Processes and Eco-Restoration's most productive authors include Defu He, Bing Xie, Zhaohui Wang, Wei‐Ning Xiang, Yang Song, Shibo Lu, Varenyam Achal, Mengting Liu, Lili Lei and Guangyin Zhen.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.