Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture

40.2k citations
3.7k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture

3.0k papers receiving 37.3k citations

Peers

Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture
Comparison fields: 5 of 230
  • Plant Science 9.2k
  • Biochemistry 1.3k
  • Food Science 3.4k
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 1.4k
  • Biomaterials 2.2k
Replace Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University with:
Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University India
Integral University India
Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya India
Jiwaji University India
Hemwati Nandan Bahuguna Garhwal University India
Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra India
GLA University India
Banasthali University India
Agriculture and Forestry University Nepal
Sharda University India
Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture relative to Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University India Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture at the time of their publication.

About Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture have published 3.7k papers, which have received a total of 40.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 531 papers in Soil Science, 393 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science, 1.4k papers in Plant Science, 188 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and 260 papers in Food Science on the topics of Agricultural Science and Fertilization (398 papers), Agricultural pest management studies (238 papers), Crop Yield and Soil Fertility (233 papers), Rice Cultivation and Yield Improvement (178 papers), Genetics and Plant Breeding (161 papers), Agricultural Economics and Practices (148 papers), Agricultural Practices and Plant Genetics (139 papers) and Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (133 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Plant Science (9.2k citations), Biochemistry (1.3k citations), Food Science (3.4k citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (1.4k citations) and Biomaterials (2.2k citations). Authors at Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture collaborate with scholars in India, Saudi Arabia and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, Inflammopharmacology, RSC Advances, Drug Discovery Today and Metabolism. Some of Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture's most productive authors include Matthew Gerard, Pramod W. Ramteke, Amita Verma, Dinesh Kumar Patel, Vikas Kumar, Mahfoozur Rahman, Uttpal Anand, Hans Raj Bhat, George Thomas and Udaya Pratap Singh.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact