Search

410 papers receiving 13.8k citations

Peers

Search
Comparison fields: 5 of 231
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 925
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 823
  • Artificial Intelligence 3.8k
  • Information Systems 2.4k
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2.1k
Replace LinkedIn (United States) with:
LinkedIn (United States) United States
Intuit (United States) United States
Protein Metrics (United States) United States
Netflix (United States) United States
Silicon Valley University United States
Center for Information Technology Research in the Interest of Society United States
Cal Poly Corporation United States
Natural Selection (United States) United States
Environmental Systems Research Institute (United States) United States
Quality Systems (United States) United States
Search relative to LinkedIn (United States) United States LinkedIn (United States)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×12.7×
LinkedIn (United States) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Search

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Search. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Search with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Search more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Search

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Search at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Search at the time of their publication.

About Search

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Search have published 472 papers, which have received a total of 14.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 55 papers in Management Science and Operations Research, 26 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 112 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 24 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation and 28 papers in Management Information Systems on the topics of Web Data Mining and Analysis (27 papers), Topic Modeling (25 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (24 papers), Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting (24 papers), Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques (22 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (22 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (20 papers) and Big Data and Business Intelligence (20 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Management of Technology and Innovation (925 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (823 citations), Artificial Intelligence (3.8k citations), Information Systems (2.4k citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2.1k citations). Authors at Search collaborate with scholars in United States, China and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Scientometrics, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, Nature Biotechnology and Information Processing & Management. Some of Search's most productive authors include Alan L. Porter, William B. Rouse, Ismael Rafols, Panayiotis Tsaparas, Heikki Mannila, Aristides Gionis, Jan Youtie, Rakesh Agrawal, Sreenivas Gollapudi and Alan Halverson.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact