Sanford Consortium for Regenerative Medicine

36.9k citations
609 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Sanford Consortium for Regenerative Medicine

556 papers receiving 35.0k citations

Peers

Sanford Consortium for Regenerative Medicine
Comparison fields: 5 of 195
  • Cancer Research 3.9k
  • Biomaterials 3.6k
  • Molecular Biology 18.2k
  • Immunology 4.9k
  • Aging 402
Replace La Jolla Institute For Molecular Medicine with:
La Jolla Institute For Molecular Medicine United States
Scripps Whittier Diabetes Institute United States
Ligand Pharmaceuticals (United States) United States
PDL BioPharma (United States) United States
Genentech United States
Neurocrine Biosciences (United States) United States
Cytokinetics (United States) United States
BioMarin (United States) United States
Myriad Genetics United States
OncoMed (United States) United States
Sanford Consortium for Regenerative Medicine relative to La Jolla Institute For Molecular Medicine United States La Jolla Institute For Molecular Medicine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
La Jolla Institute For Molecular Medicine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Sanford Consortium for Regenerative Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Sanford Consortium for Regenerative Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Sanford Consortium for Regenerative Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sanford Consortium for Regenerative Medicine more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Sanford Consortium for Regenerative Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Sanford Consortium for Regenerative Medicine at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Sanford Consortium for Regenerative Medicine at the time of their publication.

About Sanford Consortium for Regenerative Medicine

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Sanford Consortium for Regenerative Medicine have published 609 papers, which have received a total of 36.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 11 papers in Aging, 32 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 76 papers in Cell Biology, 314 papers in Molecular Biology and 51 papers in Biomaterials on the topics of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (78 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (69 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (57 papers), Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (50 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (47 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (47 papers), Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (47 papers) and RNA modifications and cancer (46 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Cancer Research (3.9k citations), Biomaterials (3.6k citations), Molecular Biology (18.2k citations), Immunology (4.9k citations) and Aging (402 citations). Authors at Sanford Consortium for Regenerative Medicine collaborate with scholars in United States, China and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Communications, Cell stem cell, Cell Reports and Blood. Some of Sanford Consortium for Regenerative Medicine's most productive authors include Anjana Rao, Adam J. Engler, Karen L. Christman, Louise C. Laurent, Jeremy N. Rich, William A. Pastor, Lawrence S.B. Goldstein, Chan‐Wang Jerry Lio, L. Aravind and Xandra O. Breakefield.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact