Southern College of Optometry

6.0k citations
253 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Southern College of Optometry

200 papers receiving 5.1k citations

Peers

Southern College of Optometry
Comparison fields: 5 of 198
  • Ophthalmology 680
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.2k
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 836
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 566
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 458
Replace Star Center with:
Star Center United States
Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation United States
Multiple Sclerosis Center of Atlanta United States
Churchill Centre United States
Virginia College United States
Methodist Rehabilitation United States
Gold Skin Care Center United States
Prevent Blindness United States
Mountain View College United States
Houston Eye Associates United States
Southern College of Optometry relative to Star Center United States Star Center's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.6×
Star Center · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Southern College of Optometry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Southern College of Optometry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Southern College of Optometry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Southern College of Optometry more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Southern College of Optometry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Southern College of Optometry at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Southern College of Optometry at the time of their publication.

About Southern College of Optometry

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Southern College of Optometry have published 253 papers, which have received a total of 6.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 42 papers in Ophthalmology, 61 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 33 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 25 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 10 papers in Dermatology on the topics of Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (57 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (30 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (26 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (26 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (14 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (14 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (11 papers) and Color Science and Applications (9 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ophthalmology (680 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.2k citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (836 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (566 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (458 citations). Authors at Southern College of Optometry collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Brazil and have published in prestigious journals including Optometry and Vision Science, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Clinical and Experimental Optometry, Contact Lens and Anterior Eye and Eye & Contact Lens Science & Clinical Practice. Some of Southern College of Optometry's most productive authors include Zijiang J. He, Wichor Matthijs Bramer, Dean Giustini, Leslie Holland, Tanja Bekhuis, Teng Leng Ooi, Ralph J. Jensen, Bing Wu, Christopher Lievens and Ibrahim F. Benter.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact