Roessingh Research and Development
Impact in
- Rehabilitation top 2%
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
-
- Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Papers in
- Rehabilitation 177
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery 172
-
- Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention 60
- Top scholars
- Hermie HermensCatherine Dißelhorst-KlugGünter RauMaarten J. IJzermanPetrus H. VeltinkMiriam Vollenbroek-HuttenKarlein M. G. SchreursJaap H. Buurke
- Journals
- Gait & Posture (32 papers)Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (30 papers)Clinical Rehabilitation (27 papers)Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation (25 papers)Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (24 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Roessingh Research and Development
769 papers receiving 30.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 217
- Rehabilitation 6.8k
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 2.5k
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 3.0k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 3.9k
- Pharmacology 3.9k
Countries citing scholars working at Roessingh Research and Development
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Roessingh Research and Development. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Roessingh Research and Development with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roessingh Research and Development more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Roessingh Research and Development
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Roessingh Research and Development at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Roessingh Research and Development at the time of their publication.
About Roessingh Research and Development
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Roessingh Research and Development have published 952 papers, which have received a total of 39.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 177 papers in Rehabilitation, 66 papers in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, 43 papers in Applied Psychology, 108 papers in Pharmacology and 88 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health on the topics of Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (172 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (137 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (108 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (67 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (64 papers), Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics (64 papers), Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (60 papers) and Spinal Cord Injury Research (47 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Rehabilitation (6.8k citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (2.5k citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (3.0k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (3.9k citations) and Pharmacology (3.9k citations). Authors at Roessingh Research and Development collaborate with scholars in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Gait & Posture, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Clinical Rehabilitation, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation and Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. Some of Roessingh Research and Development's most productive authors include Hermie Hermens, Catherine Dißelhorst-Klug, Günter Rau, Maarten J. IJzerman, Petrus H. Veltink, Miriam Vollenbroek-Hutten, Karlein M. G. Schreurs, Jaap H. Buurke, C.T.M. Baten and Ernst T. Bohlmeijer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.