Research Institute of Tropical Forestry

12.9k citations
845 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Research Institute of Tropical Forestry

762 papers receiving 12.2k citations

Peers

Research Institute of Tropical Forestry
Comparison fields: 5 of 172
  • Soil Science 2.0k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.9k
  • Plant Science 4.7k
  • Ecology 3.0k
  • Horticulture 93
Replace Guangdong Academy of Forestry with:
Guangdong Academy of Forestry China
Guangxi Institute of Botany China
Environment and Plant Protection Research Institute China
Vietnam National University of Forestry Vietnam
Guizhou Academy of Sciences China
Agricultural Genetics Institute Vietnam
Chongqing Academy of Agricultural Sciences China
Yunnan Academy of Forestry China
Sichuan Academy of Forestry China
Hainan Provincial Academy of Agricultural Sciences China
Research Institute of Tropical Forestry relative to Guangdong Academy of Forestry China Guangdong Academy of Forestry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.9×
Guangdong Academy of Forestry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Research Institute of Tropical Forestry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Research Institute of Tropical Forestry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Research Institute of Tropical Forestry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Research Institute of Tropical Forestry more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Research Institute of Tropical Forestry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Research Institute of Tropical Forestry at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Research Institute of Tropical Forestry at the time of their publication.

About Research Institute of Tropical Forestry

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Research Institute of Tropical Forestry have published 845 papers, which have received a total of 12.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 159 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 96 papers in Soil Science, 346 papers in Plant Science, 7 papers in Horticulture and 164 papers in Ecology on the topics of Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (85 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (84 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (83 papers), Forest ecology and management (73 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (69 papers), Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics (66 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (61 papers) and Plant and animal studies (56 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Soil Science (2.0k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.9k citations), Plant Science (4.7k citations), Ecology (3.0k citations) and Horticulture (93 citations). Authors at Research Institute of Tropical Forestry collaborate with scholars in China, United States and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including Forests, Frontiers in Plant Science, Forest Ecology and Management, Journal of Forestry Research and International Journal of Molecular Sciences. Some of Research Institute of Tropical Forestry's most productive authors include Han Xu, Yide Li, Baowen Liao, Yanmei Xiong, Yinglong Chen, Daping Xu, Bernard Dell, Nancai Pei, Chunjie Fan and Zaizhi Zhou.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact