Right to Care

17.4k citations
958 papers ·

Impact in

    • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
    • Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
    • HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
  • Virology top 10%
    • HIV Research and Treatment

Papers in

    • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions 124
    • HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment 49
    • Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology 47

Right to Care

779 papers receiving 14.2k citations

Peers

Right to Care
Comparison fields: 5 of 227
  • Infectious Diseases 5.9k
  • Virology 653
  • Epidemiology 3.1k
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 128
  • General Health Professions 1.3k
Replace Lancet Laboratories with:
Lancet Laboratories South Africa
Instituto Nacional de Saúde Mozambique
Ministry of Health and Child Welfare Zimbabwe
Biomedical Research and Training Institute Zimbabwe
University of Eswatini Eswatini
Ministry of Health Zambia
Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital Malawi
University of Mpumalanga South Africa
Blantyre Institute for Community Ophthalmology Malawi
South African Tuberculosis Vaccine Initiative South Africa
Right to Care relative to Lancet Laboratories South Africa Lancet Laboratories's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
Lancet Laboratories · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Right to Care

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Right to Care. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Right to Care with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Right to Care more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Right to Care

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Right to Care at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Right to Care at the time of their publication.

About Right to Care

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Right to Care have published 958 papers, which have received a total of 17.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 245 papers in Infectious Diseases, 28 papers in Virology, 133 papers in Epidemiology, 37 papers in Law and 5 papers in Equine on the topics of HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (124 papers), HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment (49 papers), Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (47 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (41 papers), Legal Issues in South Africa (28 papers), Education, sociology, and vocational training (27 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (23 papers) and HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (22 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Infectious Diseases (5.9k citations), Virology (653 citations), Epidemiology (3.1k citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (128 citations) and General Health Professions (1.3k citations). Authors at Right to Care collaborate with scholars in South Africa, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Journal of the International AIDS Society, JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, BMC Public Health and AIDS. Some of Right to Care's most productive authors include Ian Sanne, Agnès van Zanten, Mhairi Maskew, Matthew P. Fox, Louis Liebenberg, Annelies Van Rie, Cynthia S. Firnhaber, Alana T. Brennan, Marie Duru‐Bellat and Denise Hawkins Evans.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact