Royal Institution of Great Britain
Impact in
- Inorganic Chemistry top 2%
- Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
- Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis
- Materials Chemistry top 5%
- Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
- Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis
- Polyoxometalates: Synthesis and Applications
Papers in
-
- Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis 287
- Catalysis 154
- Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions 141
- Top scholars
- C. Richard A. CatlowJohn Meurig ThomasPaul Francis McMillanGopinathan SankarRobert RajaPeter A. DayGeorge PorterCaroline Mellot‐Draznieks
- Journals
- Nature (66 papers)The Journal of Physical Chemistry B (64 papers)Chemical Physics Letters (52 papers)Synthetic Metals (47 papers)Journal of Solid State Chemistry (41 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Royal Institution of Great Britain
1.7k papers receiving 86.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 229
- Inorganic Chemistry 24.2k
- Materials Chemistry 47.1k
- Catalysis 7.0k
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 13.9k
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 5.4k
Countries citing scholars working at Royal Institution of Great Britain
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Royal Institution of Great Britain. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Royal Institution of Great Britain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Royal Institution of Great Britain more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Royal Institution of Great Britain
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Royal Institution of Great Britain at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Royal Institution of Great Britain at the time of their publication.
About Royal Institution of Great Britain
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Royal Institution of Great Britain have published 1.8k papers, which have received a total of 89.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 463 papers in Inorganic Chemistry, 154 papers in Catalysis, 176 papers in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, 337 papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and 819 papers in Materials Chemistry on the topics of Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis (287 papers), Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis (182 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (180 papers), Organic and Molecular Conductors Research (145 papers), Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (141 papers), Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions (141 papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (117 papers) and Chemical Synthesis and Characterization (108 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Inorganic Chemistry (24.2k citations), Materials Chemistry (47.1k citations), Catalysis (7.0k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (13.9k citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (5.4k citations). Authors at Royal Institution of Great Britain collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and France and have published in prestigious journals including Nature, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, Chemical Physics Letters, Synthetic Metals and Journal of Solid State Chemistry. Some of Royal Institution of Great Britain's most productive authors include C. Richard A. Catlow, John Meurig Thomas, Paul Francis McMillan, Gopinathan Sankar, Robert Raja, Peter A. Day, George Porter, Caroline Mellot‐Draznieks, John Meurig Thomas and Christian Serre.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.